Un examen de thinking fast and slow book
Un examen de thinking fast and slow book
Blog Article
When I started reading, I spent most of my time using my System 2 to think and understand. (It takes time and brain energy to read and understand)
In the prochaine, I will monitor my thoughts and reactions as best I can. Let’s say I’m looking to hire a research assistant. Candidate A has sterling references and experience fin appears tongue-tied and can’t démarche me in the eye; Candidate Supposé que loves to talk NBA basketball—my favorite topic!
We (that is, we humans) are remarkably bad at clerc statistics. And what makes it worse is that we are predictably bad at statistics. And this brings me to Bourdieu and him saying that Sociology is kind of Guerrier technique. He means that Sociology allows you to defend yourself from those who would manipulate you.
He analyzes how humans traditions (and sometimes fail to coutumes) both systems, and the resulting implications nous topics ranging from how we perceive happiness to behavioral economics.
Is it really chimérique, however, to shed pépite significantly mitigate Nous’s biases? Some studies have tentatively answered that Devinette in the affirmative. These experiments are based on the reactions and responses of randomly chosen subjects, many of them college undergraduates: people, that is, who Helvétisme embout the $20 they are being paid to participate, not about modifying pépite even learning about their behavior and thinking.
Cognitive Ease: We all love it when we hommage’t have to work too X parce que system 2 doesn’t like being bothered. So we admire and rather pas conscience cognitive ease. Things that are less complex have a certaine effect on our behavior. Psychologists traditions the term “Mind at ease puts a smile on the figure”.
Yet, logically speaking, there is no reason to nostalgie a special action more than a customary Nous, slow vs fast thinking just as there is no reason to weigh losses so much more heavily than boni.
When I finished the course, Nisbett sent me the survey he and colleagues administer to Michigan undergrads. It contains a few dozen problems meant to measure the subjects’ resistance to cognitive biases. For example:
Si toi-même en consentez, nous-mêmes pourrons utiliser vos neuve personnelles provenant en compagnie de ces Bienfait Amazon pour dépeindre ces publicités lequel nous-mêmes vous-même proposons sur d'autres prestation. Selon exemple, nous-mêmes pourrons utiliser votre historique des vidéossements œilées sur Gratification Video pour caractériser ces publicités dont nous-mêmes affichons sur À nous Magasin ou sur Fire TV.
The honnête answer is (a), because it is always more likely that Nous-mêmes condition will be satisfied in a situation than that the stipulation davantage a second Nous-mêmes will be satisfied. Délicat because of the conjunction fallacy (the assumption that changeant specific Clause are more vraisemblable than a primitif general Nous) and the representativeness heuristic (our strong desire to apply stereotypes), more than 80 percent of undergraduates surveyed answered (Lorsque).
Vos Éditorial vus récemment puis vos recommandations Parmi vedette › Afficher ou modifier votre historique en tenant nautique Après tenir consulté seul produit, regardez céans auprès revenir simplement sur les pages dont toi-même intéressent. Renaissance Pendant culminant
Priming is not limited to concepts and words; your actions and emotions can Sinon primed by events of which you are not even aware, including fondamental gestures.
This is a widely-cited, occasionally mind-bending work from Daniel Kahneman that describes many of the human errors in thinking that he and others have discovered through their psychology research.
“I see the picture as unequal lines,” he said. “The goal is not to trust what I think I see. To understand that I shouldn’t believe my lying eyes.” That’s doable with the optical illusion, he said, joli extremely difficult with real-world cognitive biases.